For hundreds of thousands of years, 80% of women reproduced versus 40% of men. About 8,000 years ago, the rise of cities changed this ratio to 17 women for every 1 man. A few top males mated with hundreds or thousands of women. For example, geneticists estimate 8% of Chinese are descended from Genghis Khan. And 50% of Western Europeans are descended from a single Bronze Age king.


Before Western imperialism imposed Judeo-Christian values on the world, 83% of indigenous societies were polygynous, 16% were monogamous, and 1% were polyandrous. Polygyny is one man marrying multiple women. Polyandry is one woman marrying multiple men. Although some men had many wives, most engaged in serial monogamy—one long-term relationship followed by another.


Why would so many risk their reputations, families, careers—even presidential legacies—for something that runs against human nature? Were monogamy an ancient, evolved trait characteristic of our species, as the standard narrative insists, these ubiquitous transgressions would be infrequent and such horrible enforcement unnecessary.

-Christopher Ryan


Monogamous societies had fewer single men, which reduced rape and murder. Also, men shifted from seeking more wives to providing for their families. This increased gender equality and economic productivity.


In modern times, our evolutionary heritage continues to influence our relationships:


When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, wants to do his share in the home. These men exist and, trust me, over time, nothing is sexier.

-Sheryl Sandberg


Take a young man who started having sex at perhaps age 16 and who has gone for 10 to 15 years having a series of exciting sexual liaisons with a variety of women, some of whom he hardly knew. Then convince him to settle down and promise to have sex with only one woman for the next 60 years. Then let that woman grow older, plumper, less attractive, and let her sexual desires wane significantly while his desires remain close to what they were. Last, surround him at work and in his other activities with attractive younger women, some of whom are willing to have sex with him now and then. That will be the norm in the foreseeable future. What do you predict?

-Roy Baumeister


Beating the odds

Before getting married, here are factors that decrease divorce:


During marriage, two of the strongest predictors of divorce are:


Common disagreements include chores, quality time, in-laws, and sex. But a study of 4,500 couples found that financial disagreements were the only predictor of divorce for husbands. Finances and sex were predictors for wives.


Successful marriages typically have a 5:1 ratio of positive to negative behaviors. Disrespect, personal attacks, defensiveness, and withdrawal are especially damaging.


It takes a long time to be really married. One marries many times at many levels within a marriage. If you have more marriages than you have divorces within the marriage, you’re lucky and you stick it out.

-Ruby Dee


Overall, marriage is a partnership. There are different ways to provide value, such as making money, managing a household, having sex, and caring for children. Husbands and wives both want a fair deal—desire for fairness is hardwired into our species. If one spouse doesn’t contribute much, the marriage is unlikely to succeed.


The best way to get a good spouse is to deserve a good spouse.

-Charlie Munger


Look for someone who will love you unconditionally and will subtly encourage you to be better than you thought you can be.

-Warren Buffett


Wilder JA, Mobasher Z, Hammer MF. (2004). Genetic evidence for unequal effective population sizes of human females and males. Mol Biol Evol. 21(11): 2047–2057.


Karmin M et al. (2015). A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Res. 25(4): 459–466.


Zerjal T et al. (2003). The genetic legacy of the Mongols. Am J Hum Genet. 72(3): 717–721.


Poznik GD et al. (2016). Punctuated bursts in human male demography inferred from 1,244 worldwide Y-chromosome sequences. Nat Genet. 48(6): 593–599.


Murdock GP. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas: A summary. Ethnology. 6(2): 109–236.


Schacht R, Kramer KL. (2019). Are we monogamous? A review of the evolution of pair-bonding in humans and its contemporary variation cross-culturally. Front Ecol Evol. 7: 230.


Henrich J, Boyd R, Richerson PJ. (2012). The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 367(1589): 657–669.


Legality of polygamy. (2021, February 2). Wikipedia.


Schoen R, Standish N. (2001). The retrenchment of marriage: Results from marital status life tables for the United States, 1995. Population Development Review. 27(3): 553–563.


Copen CE et al. (2012). First marriages in the United States: data from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth. Natl Health Stat Report. 22(49): 1–21.


Windle L. (2016, August 14). The Lovers’ League. Sun.


Wolfinger KH. (2017, July 5). America’s generation gap in extramarital sex. Institute Family Studies.


Beating the odds

Wilcox WB et al. (2009). The state of our unions: Marriage in America, 2009. National Marriage Project.


Dew J, Britt S, Huston S. (2012). Examining the relationship between financial issues and divorce. Family Relations. 61(4): 615–628.


Gottman JM, Levenson RW. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: behavior, physiology, and health. J Pers Soc Psychol. 63(2): 221–233.


Gottman JM, Levenson RW. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14‐year period. J Marriage Fam. 62(3): 737–745. 


Birditt KS et al. (2010). Marital conflict behaviors and implications for divorce over 16 years. J Marriage Fam. 72(5): 1188–1204.  


Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM. (2014). Evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science. 346(6207): 1251776. 


Wang Y et al. (2019). Born for fairness: evidence of genetic contribution to a neural basis of fairness intuition. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 14(5): 539–548.

Did you enjoy this chapter? Read the full book. Download your free copy: EPUB PDF

Copyright © by Raven Dojo Inc.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty